Bug ! airbag fiat bravo 2007

Report any bugs found in multiecuscan
Post Reply
Aron96
Posts: 63
Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 20:21
Location: Italia(sicilia)

Bug ! airbag fiat bravo 2007

Post by Aron96 » 30 Sep 2012, 05:30

Hello Yani, with multiecuscan vers 3.6.2. I was recorded diagnosis of Fiat Bravo 1.6 Multijet 16v year 2008 of airbag system, then upgraded to 1.0 multiecuscan but this time after the update I have not used more to diagnosis of fiat bravo airbags but on the remaining units instead, can not log in in diagnosis airbag, my obd interface works, the error it gives me when I try to get in diagnosis, Elm 327> ECU connection failed!
control interface settings, COM port, pin eobd adequate.
after various controls settings interface, also tried to change the speed of 3800 - to 9800 - but nothing like I always connection failed message.
There is a bug in this version you can, please check
greetings

yani
Site Admin
Posts: 1175
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 16:40

Re: Bug ! airbag fiat bravo 2007

Post by yani » 02 Oct 2012, 05:52

So, you can connect to dasboard and body computer without problems? And only the airbag fails?

Aron96
Posts: 63
Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 20:21
Location: Italia(sicilia)

Re: Bug ! airbag fiat bravo 2007

Post by Aron96 » 02 Oct 2012, 11:48

you are able to enter into body computer diagnosis and framework, I also successfully executed proxy alignment ok, but right now I want to get in diagnosis airbag me error connection as described in the first post.
greetings

yani
Site Admin
Posts: 1175
Joined: 06 Nov 2009, 16:40

Re: Bug ! airbag fiat bravo 2007

Post by yani » 02 Oct 2012, 12:19

Please send me a report after trying to connect to the airbag (from the red Send Report button).

Aron96
Posts: 63
Joined: 30 Apr 2011, 20:21
Location: Italia(sicilia)

Re: Bug ! airbag fiat bravo 2007

Post by Aron96 » 02 Oct 2012, 18:24

the transmission ratio I can not send with this notebook, I have no possibility to send to take the relationship differently if you if you can give me advice how to make
greetings

Post Reply